FACULTY
David Kahn. Ph.D.
TRFT
HGH 110;
924-4540
david.kahn@sjsu.edu
FAX 924-4543
Office Hours:
TR 12:30-3:00 pm
|
CLASS MEETING -- Selected MONDAYS 3:30-4:45 p.m. –
HGH 114
REQUIRED TEXTS
No particular texts are required for this course. However, you may
wish to refer to the following books often used in TA 200 and available
from Amazon.com:
- Gibaldi, MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (6th
ed.)
- Booth, Colomb and Williams, The Craft of Research
- Zinsser, On Writing Well (6th ed.)
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This class is conducted as a series of concise workshops related to
the process developing a Thesis Proposal. The texts we consider are
your own writing, geared toward the benchmark assignments. The issues
we discuss are those that you encounter in the preliminary research
and proposal-writing processes. As the class progresses, it will alternate
between a) meeting as a group to allow you to raise issues about research
dilemmas and get useful feedback on your specific concerns; b) individual
meetings with me in my office during this course time slot, my scheduled
office hours, or, if necessary, at some other agreed-upon time.
The bulk of the work, however, will be done by you, independently,
outside of class, in the library, on your computers. No one can do this
work for you. Consider all group meetings and appointments as a kind
of lab period: they are mandatory and vital to your progress toward
a successful proposal and thesis. Whether you complete the assignment
for a given benchmark, you must come prepared to share what you do have
with your peers and be open to constructive feedback.
REQUIREMENTS/GRADING
If you haven't already, you should make an appointment to see me to
go over your "Request for Candidacy" form (30 unit program).
Follow closely the Thesis Proposal guidelines and calendar
on the TRFT Graduate Web site:
http://www.tvradiofilmtheatre.org/MA/Pages/Thesisprop.html
The specific requirements are all there. Look closely at all of the
on-line material. You must fulfill the formal requirements of the Thesis
Proposal and write it up in academically persuasive scholarly style.
Pay particular attention to the matters concerning "Human Subjects
Review."
Apply the methods of research from TA 200 in forming
questions, conducting thorough literature reviews, narrowing the topic,
defining a "systematic, rigorous, repeatable" methodology.
While there's some fluidity in our format standards, we are consistent
in emphasizing 1) a clearly stated research question or problem; 2)
a viable methodology; and 3) feasibility. This process generally demonstrates
the student's capability to pursue thesis-level research. It's also
a vital prerequisite to earning the advocacy of your advising professor.
You must entice a qualified faculty member to work with you to develop
your Proposal. Working with you to help prepare a Proposal does not
necessarily mean a faculty member is committed to serve as First Reader
after the proposal is approved by the Graduate Committee. Most faculty,
however, are interested in continuing to advise the thesis.
It is your responsibility to meet all benchmark
draft deadlines and to allow enough time for reading and revision
of drafts. (Please don't expect a faculty member to read a draft and
respond overnight. It's a good idea to allow at least 1-week turnaround.)
Each component of the proposal should be drafted as benchmark due dates
arrive. Any unfinished component should still have place markers in
each draft that you discuss in class or take to scheduled meetings with
me or other faculty. In general, the following components should appear
in the Proposal in the order suggested below (subject to your First
Reader’s preferences). Note that we will not necessarily address
these components in class in the order that they are listed here, because
the process of developing a thesis proposal differs from the finished
product.
- Statement of Problem/Question
- Significance
- Literature Review
- Terminology
- Method
- Feasibility
- Chapter Breakdown/Structure
- Bibliography
Date and save each draft of your Proposal so that you and your readers
know which version you’re working with.
GRADING
To receive an "Incomplete" in the course, a student must have
completed all of the assignment benchmarks through Draft 4, regardless
of whether he or she decides, with the recommendation of the First Reader,
to submit a final proposal and defend that proposal to the TRFT Graduate
Committee at the end of the semester.
After the formal presentation on May 14, a Thesis Proposal will be
1) accepted, 2) denied, or 3) it may be "conditionally accepted"
if the Graduate Committee determines that the research should proceed
subject to "conditions" enforced by the First Reader. If "conditionally
accepted," the student's TA 260 grade registers as an Incomplete
until the conditions are satisfied. In such cases, the student may still
enroll in TA 299 with the first order of business being to satisfy the
"conditions" or deficiencies in the Thesis Proposal.
UNIVERSITY POLICIES
A. Academic Integrity Statement
“Your own commitment to learning, as evidenced by your enrollment
at San Jose State University and the University’s Integrity Policy,
require you to be honest in all your academic course work. Faculty members
are required to report all infractions to the Office of Judicial Affairs.”
The policy on academic integrity can be found at:
http://sa.sjsu.edu/judicial_affairs/index.html
One form of academic dishonesty is plagiarism--taking
ideas, writing, or work from another person or source and representing
them as one's own. Plagiarism includes both having someone
else write your papers and cutting and pasting from the Internet.
For advice on how to avoid plagiarism, consult the following site:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_plagiar.html
B. Campus policy in compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act
“If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of a
disability, or if you need special arrangements in case the building
must be evacuated, please make an appointment with me as soon as possible,
or see me during office hours. Presidential Directive 97-03 requires
that students with disabilities register with the DRC to establish a
record of their disability.”
THEATRE ARTS M. A. PROGRAM – STUDENT
LEARNING OBJECTIVES (*specific to TA260)
- Learn research methods appropriate for answering
questions and solving problems in the field.
- Acquire skills in information gathering, data and
text interpretation, performance in different media, and performance
technologies.
- Evaluate previous research, attitudes, and achievements
in performing arts from a critical perspective.
- Learn to identify historical, cognitive, aesthetic,
or cultural realities governing the evolution of the performing arts.
- Develop persuasive research evidence in the format
of academic journal publication.
- Demonstrate effective pedagogical strategy and
teaching effectiveness.
- Contribute creative or organizational leadership
in performing arts education and culture.
- * Identify a valid area of new academic inquiry
and an appropriate research methodology designed to sustain the attention
of an influential, critical audience.
- Prepare for competitive entry into doctoral programs
or other significant areas of career advancement, arts education and
culture.
TA 260 - SCHEDULE (subject to revision
4/9/08)
| Jan
28 |
***WORKSHOP
***
Distribution and explanation of green sheet,
course schedule, and class policies
Getting started on a literature review (regardless of area of interest)
If applicable, complete Human Subjects Review documentation available
from SJSU Graduate Studies and Research Office (SSC) early! |
| Feb
4 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS***
Make appointment to review "Request for Candidacy" form |
| Feb
11 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS***
|
| Feb
18 |
***WORKSHOP
***
Due: Draft 1:
Bare-bones Proposal with appropriate component headings and in-progress
Literature Review and Bibliography drafted, properly formatted.
- Literature Review
Provide a brief critique of the previous discourse on the topic
you think you’d like to research and write about. Outline
the major positions of understanding in relation to the problem.
These "positions" come from scholarly sources, but also
from representatives of the popular culture, from artists, intellectuals
and journalists, lawyers, and from voices in history. Positions
are not always articulated in written form or even in language.
Performances themselves, in all media, articulate ideological
objectives and are part of the "literature." Please
do not waste time (ours as well as yours) claiming that no previous
discourse exists in relation to your subject matter. What do you
intend to study? Discourse on a problem may be much older and
more diverse than the narrow subject matter of interest to you.
- Bibliography
Compile a preliminary bibliography as you conduct your literature
search and review, which identifies your major sources of evidence
(publications, archives, videos, performance documentation, interviews,
etc.). Use MLA Guidelines for correct reference and bibliographic
citation.
- Identify First Reader for Proposal
You should have approached your desired First Reader and discussed
your area of research interest with him or her by this date.
|
| Feb
25 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 2
Proposal with in-progress Literature Review, Bibliography and now
Statement of Question/Problem drafted.
- Statement of Question/Problem
Begin by stating the problem/asking the question clearly and concisely.
Identify a problem/question to which you have no answer, and to
which previous research provides only inadequate or incomplete
answers. The Thesis Proposal does not argue a thesis; rather,
it sets up the framework for an argument, the rules by which you
will answer the question you have asked.
|
| Mar
3 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS*** |
| Mar
10 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 3:
Proposal with in-progress Literature Review, Bibliography, Statement
of Question/Problem, and now Significance drafted.
- Significance
Why is your project important? How does it make a difference?
Why do you care about it? Why should we care about it? Why is
now a good time for this investigation?
|
| Mar
17 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS*** |
| |
SPRING
BREAK |
| Mar
31 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS*** |
| Apr
7 |
***TBA*** |
| Apr
14 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 4:
New components for this draft: Methodology, Feasibility, Terminology,
and Chapter Structure/Breakdown drafted. (This draft should
contain all components in the order suggested at the start of the
Assignment Benchmarks section of this green sheet, unless otherwise
indicated by your First Reader. )
- Method
How do you plan to solve the problem or answer the question in
your Thesis Proposal? Here you discuss the subject matter which
exemplifies the problem/question. What are the chief sources of
evidence? Identify the nature of the evidence (text, images, statistical
data, interviews, surveys, human subjects, biographical material,
videos, archive materials, etc.) and the authority of the evidence
in relation to the problem. How much evidence do you seek? By
what principle do you select the evidence? How do you plan to
use the evidence to structure an argument in response to the problem?
How will you interpret the evidence? From what theoretical perspective,
what position or bias?
- Feasibility
Is the problem narrow enough or sufficiently focused for the evidence
to provide a persuasive solution? Do you have the skills or resources
necessary to support your proposed work? Do you have the foreign
language, mathematical, or technical abilities required to solve
the problem with authority? Do you have access to necessary archives,
libraries or persons? Do you have the resources necessary to carry
out experimental performance projects or projects involving analysis
of human subjects responses? Does your project require human subjects
research authorization from the University?
- Terminology
Indicate key terms within the proposal which need definition or
which conceal discursive or theoretical difficulties.
- Chapter breakdown/structure
Indicate a preliminary chapter breakdown. Conventional thesis
structure is five chapters. Don't imagine fewer chapters, avoid
more than seven
|
| Apr
21 |
***NO
CLASS MEETING***
Due to your First Reader: Proposal
with all in-progress components, correctly formatted, with title
page.
|
| Apr
28 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS*** |
| May
5 |
**Due
May 1: First Reader-Approved Thesis Proposals go
to TRFT Graduate Committee (4 copies)
The 10-15 page Proposal must give a tentative title for the thesis
project, and this title, along with your name, name of your First
Reader, and the date, should form the cover page for the proposal.
Follow MLA and Graduate Studies guidelines. |
| May
12 |
***INDIVIDUAL
MEETINGS*** |
May
14 (10AM) |
Presentation of
Thesis Proposal
A brief Oral Presentation of the Thesis Proposal occurs on the day
before final exams begin. At that time, the Graduate Faculty will
vote on the proposal. Once the proposal accepted, the candidate
is "advanced to candidacy." A Thesis Committee, consisting
of three readers, including your First Reader, is assigned. (At
least two persons on your thesis Committee must come from the TRFT
Department, and at least two persons on your committee must have
doctoral degrees.) |
|